Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2010 21:02:34 +0100 From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, Ana Kukec <anchie@FreeBSD.org>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r211501 - in head/sys: modules modules/send netinet netinet6 sys Message-ID: <BA312DC6-878D-440F-95C6-4E8F50F75802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C701901.8030505@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008191131.o7JBV4Yf002412@svn.freebsd.org> <4C6D18BE.2000905@fer.hr> <4C6D95A8.9070105@FreeBSD.org> <20100819213159.B48418@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4C6DDB74.3090102@FreeBSD.org> <7186318F-0921-41E5-9641-3D6B45E0623B@FreeBSD.org> <4C701901.8030505@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 21 Aug 2010, at 19:20, Doug Barton wrote: > On 08/21/2010 05:07, Rui Paulo wrote: >>> Meanwhile, the fact that in the past code has been committed >>> without man pages is the exact cause of the problem you're >>> describing. It is certainly not a justification for continuing to >>> do it wrong. >>=20 >> Reverting code just because it doesn't have a man page is pointless. >> Everyone can write the damn man page, but not everyone can write >> code. You should really take this into consideration when proposing a >> commit to be reverted. >=20 > So let's assume that having lots of code in the tree without a man = page is a problem. Further, let's assume that we don't want the problem = to get worse. How do you propose that we accomplish that? By writing man pages...? Like I said, everyone can write a man page.. I did write man pages for = stuff that hasn't had a man page for years (ctfmerge, ctfconvert, etc.). Regards, -- Rui Paulo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BA312DC6-878D-440F-95C6-4E8F50F75802>