Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:09:03 +0200 From: Bernhard Froehlich <decke@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@ridecharge.com> Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/redmine & www/rubygem-rack conflict Message-ID: <65de797887a2baf0bf6a016f4f0f324c@bluelife.at> In-Reply-To: <4BFCDB80.7080007@ridecharge.com> References: <4BFCDB80.7080007@ridecharge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:27:44 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@ridecharge.com> wrote: > redmine only works with rack 1.0.1 b/c it bundles rails < 2.3.6 in vendor/. > > See also http://www.redmine.org/boards/2/topics/10334 > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/FreeBSD/logs/9-CURRENT-amd64-rubygems/ > > Of the 250+ rubygem- ports only a few actually depend on rack. > > devel/rubygem-gdata > devel/rubygem-rascut > japanese/rubygem-jpmobile > www/rubygem-ramaze > www/rubygem-sinatra > Anyone that can test these runtime would be appreciated > > www/redmine > www/redmine-basecamp > www/rubygem-thin > decke@ and myself are working on these > creating www/rubygem-rack101 or gem install are 2 possible solutions I've decided to solve it by patching the version check in redmine and tested it for a few hours now. It seems to work fine so I will commit the fix to the tree soon. The test also included thin 1.2.5 so it also seems to work fine with rack 1.1.0. http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/revision/?rev=850 > mail/rubygem-actionmailer > www/rubygem-actionpack > www/rubygem-passenger > www/rubygem-rails > www/typo > we know these work > > www/rubygem-innate > already has and update and a pr for a fix -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?65de797887a2baf0bf6a016f4f0f324c>