Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Feb 1998 02:13:56 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        hoek@hwcn.org (Tim Vanderhoek)
Cc:        nate@mt.sri.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com, tlambert@primenet.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: More breakage in -current as a result of header frobbing.
Message-ID:  <199802230213.TAA18100@usr08.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.980222125808.16665B-100000@james.hwcn.org> from "Tim Vanderhoek" at Feb 22, 98 01:29:59 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > avoided.  However, many committers (myself included) know that in
> > reality there is no punishment for breaking the tree, so why bother
> > testing things more heavily when someone is going to end up doing that
> > work for me?
> 
> For most, I imagine listening to Terry go off on another CVS
> global llama locking tangent is punishment enough!!


Heh.  "I are a component of yur quality control feedback loop".


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199802230213.TAA18100>