Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 11:08:05 +0930 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: ben@rosengart.com, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is tickadj still required in -CURRENT ? Message-ID: <19981009110805.N3369@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.02.9810082024490.17109-100000@echonyc.com>; from Snob Art Genre on Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 08:26:20PM -0400 References: <3256.907891423@time.cdrom.com> <Pine.GSO.4.02.9810082024490.17109-100000@echonyc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday, 8 October 1998 at 20:26:20 -0400, Snob Art Genre wrote: > On Thu, 8 Oct 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > >> It's been more of a code slush, and the rule still nonetheless in >> effect seems to be "bring it in if it's not too scarey OR if it >> represents something we really need to get out of the way before 3.0, >> or it will be more painful after." That still leaves a large number >> of things which are being deliberately postponed until after 3.0. >> They'd be nice to have, but we don't have an urgent need to cross the >> bridges they represent at this particular time. > > So when is someone going to look at the reproducible, fully documented, > weeks-old filesystem bug I posted to this list two days ago? Would a > send-pr help? Yes. It's probably the only way you can get somebody to look at it. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981009110805.N3369>