Date: Wed, 08 Jan 1997 10:34:56 -0500 From: Greg Burch <gregb@qosnet.com> To: mika ruohotie <bsdcur@shadows.aeon.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, png@qosnet.com Subject: Re: dedicating bandwidth? Message-ID: <32D3BEA0.31DFF4F5@qosnet.com> References: <199701080751.JAA14506@shadows.aeon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mika, We have implemented st2+ (rfc1819) and rsvp for freebsd beginning with 2.1.5. Our implementation includes resource (bandwidth) reservation, management, policing, etc for WAN services such as ppp and fr. If I understand your question correctly, the bandwidth management components may address what you are looking to do. Regards, Greg Burch Qosnetics gregb@qosnet.com . mika ruohotie wrote: > > hmm... > > i think i did ask about this a while back, but didnt get any answers... > > that leads me to assume my message didnt get thru somehow... > > anyway, i would like to dedicate bandwidth between my machine, and the > ethernet machine(s). meaning that the ethernet can not take the full > ppp bandwidth and also that my machine can not take it all so that there's > something left for the ethernet users... > > i expect being "forced" to hack the kernel code, so few pointers would > be welcome, i know some c but am no wizard... > > since i'm running current i would assume -current is somewhat approppriate > place, and i would assume someone on the isp land have done it... > > i dont know how usefull the feature would be, but just depending how hard > it is to do, would it be possible to include something like that as a > feature? > > at the moment i use bit over a week old -current (havent upgraded coz there's > the swap leakage thingie out there) > > mickey > -- > mika ruohotie mika@aeon.net > net/sys admin mickey@supsys.fi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32D3BEA0.31DFF4F5>