Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Jan 2003 00:27:54 -0800 (PST)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
Cc:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>, Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_acl.c kern_descrip.c kern_event.c kern_mac.c sys_pipe.c sys_socket.c uipc_socket.c uipc_syscalls.c uipc_usrreq.c vfs_aio.c vfs_syscalls.c vfs_vnops.c src/sys/netgraph ng_socket.c src/sys/sys file.h src/sys/ufs/ffs ...
Message-ID:  <200301120827.h0C8RswL067595@apollo.backplane.com>
References:  <200301120137.h0C1bD0E098037@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030111213259.E212@locore.ca> <200301120254.h0C2srcS043241@apollo.backplane.com> <20030112014644.F212@locore.ca> <20030112075042.GE33821@elvis.mu.org> <3E2122F6.70400@btc.adaptec.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

:With an re@ hat on, I agree with Alfred.  When RELENG_5_0 was branched
:we asked that gratuitous changes and API, ABI, etc changes be kept to a
:minimum and that re@ be consulted before doing them.  Cleaning up the code
:is fine, changing the names and types of structure members in the API goes
:against the spirit of what was requested.
:
:Please revert your changes to sys/sys/file.h.
:
:Scott

   You have got to be joking.  If you can show me how this interferes with
   the release process then, sure, I have no problem reverting the commit.
   But I have been fairly careful to not make changes in areas under active
   development for the release and nothing I've done here even remotely
   comes close to screwing around with the release.

   You know something, three people have submitted patches to me directly
   in the last month.  No, make that four people now.  No.  Five people.
   Half that stuff is still in my tree waiting for an opportune time to
   commit.  I'm working through it all as quickly as I can.

   Do you know why?  Because they get nothing but shit on the lists when
   they try to have them reviewed there.  It's crap like this which is
   destroying our community and our development process.  So please reconsider
   your request.  Consider the amount of work you are asking me to undertake
   and consider whether it is truely necessary for the release process to
   impose that degee of work.  Because I think it's a specious and 
   inappropriate use of your position.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200301120827.h0C8RswL067595>