Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:00:33 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: [Bug 210557] sys/geom broken kyua status for 11.0 -r302180 (only tested on rpi2 with -mcpu=cortex-a7 in use) Message-ID: <bug-210557-32464-GrYP4n9nWN@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-210557-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-210557-32464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210557 --- Comment #3 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- (In reply to Ngie Cooper from comment #2) This is an Raspberry Pi 2B context. I'm not sure what FreeBSD is doing for frequency control. As it sits at the moment it reports: hw.cpufreq.turbo: 1 hw.cpufreq.sdram_freq: 450000000 hw.cpufreq.core_freq: 250000000 hw.cpufreq.arm_freq: 900000000 . . . dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.0.freq_settings: 900/-1 600/-1 dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.0.%parent: cpu0 dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.0.%pnpinfo:=20 dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.0.%location:=20 dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.0.%driver: bcm2835_cpufreq dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.0.%desc: CPU Frequency Control dev.bcm2835_cpufreq.%parent:=20 dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 900/-1 600/-1 dev.cpu.0.freq: 900 I will note that I have the root file system on a USB SSD, although the ker= nel is from the SD card. The USB SSD combination is operationally much faster t= han the SD card. If there was significant I/O to the SD card things would take = even longer. While technically the USB SSD is a fast USB3 SSD on a USB3 capable hub the = rpi2 only has USB2 and does not fully utilize USB2 capacity form what I've seen. (But I've done no formal benchmarks so far.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-210557-32464-GrYP4n9nWN>