Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 01 Feb 2006 16:49:24 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu>
To:        Lisa Casey <lisa@jellico.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Getting a new server
Message-ID:  <43E0D884.4040109@t-hosting.hu>
In-Reply-To: <014001c62743$f11bf070$d51a2cd0@lisac>
References:  <014001c62743$f11bf070$d51a2cd0@lisac>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lisa Casey wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My company (a medium sized ISP) has decided to replace one of our mail 
> servers. We need more CPU power, memory, etc. My boss is talking about 
> getting 2 good size hard drives with a raid card to mirror these. I 
> was planning to install FreeBSD 5.3 (because that's the latest distro 
> I have CD's for) unless anyone has a good reason why not.
>
> I'll be installing Sendmail, mimedefang/spamassassin (somewhat CPU 
> intensive), bind (for  a caching name server), Qpopper, procmail. We 
> currently have 500 - 600 mail accounts on the current server, and plan 
> to move these to the new server plus use the new one for growth (I 
> don't know how quickly new mail accounts will be added, but say 20 to 
> 50 accounts per month.

I'd suggest using courier-imap or something else instead of qpopper. 
Afaik, qpopper supports only the mailbox format, which is slower and 
less secure than the maildir format used by modern pop3/imap servers. 
Courier-imap has a pop3 and an imap part, both of them have SSL support 
and are easily configurable. Your company migth benefit from running an 
imap server too. It has a bunch of advantages over pop3, so this might 
make your users feel more appreciated.

Regards,

Gabor Kovesdan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E0D884.4040109>