Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:15:12 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netgraph only on i386/ia64 - why ? Message-ID: <412550A0.4090805@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20040819175739.jdp@polstra.com> References: <XFMail.20040819175739.jdp@polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Polstra wrote: >I dropped scottl and re from the cc list, since they're busy and asked >us to work it out on our own. > >On 20-Aug-2004 Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>Ok so what is the next number that should be used? >>it's currently #define __FreeBSD_version 600000 >> >>600001? >> >> > >Yes, that would be the next number. I question whether >__FreeBSD_version needs to be bumped at all, though, since the >change is already reflected in NG_VERSION and NG_ABI_VERSION. Any >port that uses netgraph would be compiled against the header files >on the system, so I can't see how it would be useful to change >__FreeBSD_version for this. (Not that I feel very strongly about it.) > I sort of agree.. We protect ourselves.. we needn't bump the FreeBSD version I don't think.. If you have a good reason for it I'll do it but I don't think it is required.. No port will be compiled with different options because of this.. I mean 5.3 and 6.0 will already have a netgraph recompile required.. > > > >>here's a cut-n-paste version.. for comment.. >>it's ready to commit. >> >> > >Thanks for taking this on. I haven't tested it, but it looks good. >Just one nit: "align" is misspelled as "allign" in the UPDATING entry. > >John >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412550A0.4090805>