Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:58:20 -0600 From: Chris Petrik <cpet@sdf.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnustep group Message-ID: <51463C7C.8090405@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: <1363554409.51642@da3m0n8t3r.com> References: <1363554409.51642@da3m0n8t3r.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/17/2013 03:06 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Waitman Gobble <uzimac@da3m0n8t3r.com> wrote .. >> Chris Petrik <cpet@sdf.org> wrote .. >>> Looking at the current state of gnustep and I am wondering if any >>> commiters would be interested in creating a gnustep group/team? as a lot >>> of ports have no maintainer and would be nice if there was a ML and >>> other means for gnustep ? >>> >>> Chris >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> Hi, >> >> Sounds great. I'm not a committer but was looking at gnustep earlier today, have >> a need for a JBOS system and this could be good for a wall. It's an interesting >> coincidence I suppose. >> I'll check out ports status. >> > > Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. it doesn't work with base clang. > > However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest. > Here are my notes so far. > > https://dx.burplex.com/bin/gnustep.html > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I plan on updating gnustep and friends as well as take all gnustep related ports. However it will take a while.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51463C7C.8090405>