Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2000 20:13:20 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Wesley Morgan <morganw@chemicals.tacorp.com> Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ray committed Message-ID: <200011130313.UAA03395@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 12 Nov 2000 21:53:32 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011122152410.34677-100000@volatile.chemicals.tacorp.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011122152410.34677-100000@volatile.chemicals.tacorp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011122152410.34677-100000@volatile.chemicals.tacorp.com> Wesley Morgan writes: : How would you say these cards compare to a wavelan or aironet? I think a couple more words are in order. They work OK. However, they are slower than the 2.0M aironet that I used at BSDcon. They are a lot slower than the 11M wavelan cards. They have a higher packet loss rate than the aironet or wavelan cards I've used here and at BSDcon. Their only advantage is cost. They are a lot cheaper than all other wireless cards because webgear went out of business and have been dumped in the market. I paid like $120 for my pair. So, comapred to the wavelan and aironet they suck. But compared to nothing, they aren't too bad. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011130313.UAA03395>