Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:45:01 +0200 From: "Ronald Klop" <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q) eclipse 3.2 (Callisto) Message-ID: <op.te0bpbbu8527sy@guido.klop.ws> In-Reply-To: <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com> References: <970c0a6b0607280839qc05e2b8p51118955745b7cda@mail.gmail.com> <20060828161538.GI89053@vision.anyware> <44F332FF.5050809@appriss.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:16:31 +0200, David Sledge <dsledge@appriss.com> wrote: > > > > Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> > It is already more than one month now since we talked about the >> > port of Eclipse 3.2. Have you been able to have a successful >> > build on a reasonable number of platforms? >> >> > When do you think you will submit a PR to get this update >> > committed? >> >> > Thanks in advance, >> > > [cut some text] > > I feel the port itself is solid and ready for the PR to be sent. If > there are no objections I will go ahead and submit it, If there are I > can submit it as eclipse-devel so that maybe a larger user base will > start working with it. If nobody objects my only question is to ask if > it is ok to submit the PR without any other ports that depend on the > 3.1.2 version of eclipse being updated first. Or do I need to submit the > port of eclipse 3.2 first so that the other ports can then be updated to > use it? Maybe it is possible to repocopy eclipse to eclipse31. And change the depending ports for the new location. Just an idea. Don't know how much work it is. Ronald. -- Ronald Klop Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.te0bpbbu8527sy>