Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 19:22:27 +0000 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> To: Bernhard Froehlich <decke@freebsd.org> Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@ridecharge.com>, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/redmine & www/rubygem-rack conflict Message-ID: <4BFD74F3.7020708@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <65de797887a2baf0bf6a016f4f0f324c@bluelife.at> References: <4BFCDB80.7080007@ridecharge.com> <65de797887a2baf0bf6a016f4f0f324c@bluelife.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/26/10 12:09, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >> decke@ and myself are working on these >> creating www/rubygem-rack101 or gem install are 2 possible solutions > > I've decided to solve it by patching the version check in redmine and > tested it for a few hours now. It seems to work fine so I will commit the > fix to the tree soon. The test also included thin 1.2.5 so it also seems to > work fine with rack 1.1.0. That makes the most sense. I still don't know why the ruby community sopratically decided to be so exacting with racks versions everywhere. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 VP Apache Infrastructure; Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. System Admin, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BFD74F3.7020708>