Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:29:10 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: sysctl additional functions/macros Message-ID: <20080104022910.GF76698@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <477D999E.5080704@elischer.org> References: <477D931D.4000303@elischer.org> <20080104021905.GE76698@elvis.mu.org> <477D999E.5080704@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> [080103 18:25] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >Yes, but EINVAL please. > > I wondered who would be the first to complain about that.. > > "Gee you Juniper people have no sense of humour" :-) :-) I just don't see any point in prefering one non-descriptive error message over another, other than to confuse/annoy people. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080104022910.GF76698>