Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Dec 1999 00:53:18 +1030 (CST)
From:      Matthew Thyer <matt@camtech.net.au>
To:        Greg Childers <gchil0@pop.uky.edu>
Cc:        sos@freebsd.dk, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ATA problem
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912120046500.2069-100000@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.58.19991211021308.00955600@pop.uky.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Does your /etc/fstab have character devices listed or block devices ?

If it has character devices (aka raw devices), change them to block
(remove the 'r' at the front) e.g. change: "/dev/rad0s2a" to
"/dev/ad0s2a".

It seems to be only necessary for the root filesystem.

Some people (like me) changed their fstabs to raw devices after a
message from Poul Henning-Kamp (I hope thats the spelling) saying that
it should be possible to use only raw devices throughout the system.
This worked for a while but then other changes made it unable to boot.

On Sat, 11 Dec 1999, Greg Childers wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> With a bit of investigating, I've found the problem described in my previous email quoted at
> the end of this message started with the commits listed below.  A kernel built using 
> sources just before these commits works fine, whereas a kernel build just after freezes
> after the line
> 
> Mounting root from ufs:wd0s1a
> 
> Hope this helps.  If you need any more info, just ask.
> 
> Greg
> 
> 
> sos         1999/10/09 12:57:15 PDT
> 
>    Modified files:
>      sys/dev/ata          ata-all.c ata-all.h ata-disk.c ata-disk.h 
>                           ata-dma.c atapi-all.c atapi-all.h 
>                           atapi-cd.c atapi-fd.c atapi-fd.h 
>                           atapi-tape.c atapi-tape.h 
>    Log:
>    Add support for the HPT366 chip, this is used on the Abit boards and
>    their HotRod controller and on SIIG PCI ultra DMA controller. These
>    changes also made lots of the Promise code go away, its all much more
>    generic this way.
>    
>    Get rid of atapi_immed_cmd, instead use the queue to move atapi commands
>    from interrupt context if nessesary, the entire atapi layer has
>    gotten an overhaul.
>    
>    Lots of fixes to utililize the new features in subr_disk.c etc, and
>    get rid of the last biots of softc arrays in the drivers, the
>    only one left is atadevices which cannot easily go away (yet).
>    
>    Use our own malloc names, its a lot easier to track memory usage this way.
>    
>    General cleanup overall.
>    
>    Revision  Changes    Path
>    1.24      +191 -160  src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.c
>    1.12      +21 -14    src/sys/dev/ata/ata-all.h
>    1.30      +57 -56    src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.c
>    1.13      +14 -5     src/sys/dev/ata/ata-disk.h
>    1.14      +174 -59   src/sys/dev/ata/ata-dma.c
>    1.18      +146 -169  src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.c
>    1.12      +25 -27    src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-all.h
>    1.21      +68 -92    src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-cd.c
>    1.21      +20 -20    src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-fd.c
>    1.6       +11 -11    src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-fd.h
>    1.18      +50 -60    src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-tape.c
>    1.8       +50 -50    src/sys/dev/ata/atapi-tape.h
> 
> 
> 
> sos         1999/10/09 13:22:02 PDT
> 
>    Modified files:
>      sys/conf             options 
>    Log:
>    Add the options for the ATA driver.
>    
>    Revision  Changes    Path
>    1.159     +5 -1      src/sys/conf/options
> 
> 
> 
> >Hello,
> >
> >Seems now is the time to raise problems with ATA, so here goes.  I have used the ATA driver
> >since its introduction into -current without problem until recently.  A kernel from October
> >5 worked fine.  Now, it no longer works using ATA, but works fine using the old WD drivers.
> >The console freezes after the dmesg and the keyboard is unresponsive.  The ata info in
> >MYKERNEL is a direct cut and paste from GENERIC.  The motherboard is an Intel Premiere/PCI
> >(Batman's Revenge).  According to technical product summary, the primary IDE interface, on
> >which both my drives reside, is a PCTech RZ1000 on the PCI local bus.  The secondary IDE
> >interface is a SMC 37C665 I/O controller on the ISA bus.  Below is the relevant sections of
> >a verbose dmesg.  If there's any additional info I can provide to help diagnose thisproblem,
> >please ask.  
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Greg
> >
> >ata-pci0: <Unknown PCI IDE controller (generic mode)> at device 1.0 on pci0
> >ata-pci0: Busmastering DMA not supported
> >ata0: iobase=0x01f0 altiobase=0x03f4
> >ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=50
> >ata0: mask=03 status0=50 status1=50
> >ata0: devices = 0x3
> >ata0 at 0x01f0 irq 0 on ata-pci0
> >
> >ata-isa0: already registered as ata0
> >
> >BIOS Geometries:
> >  0:020a1f3f 0..522=523 cylinders, 0..31=32 heads, 1..63=63 sectors
> >  1:026b3f3f 0..619=620 cylinders, 0..63=64 heads, 1..63=63 sectors
> >  0 accounted for
> >Device configuration finished.
> >         device combination doesn't support shared irq0
> >         intr_connect(irq0) failed, result=-1
> >
> >ad0: piomode=3 dmamode=1 udmamode=-1 cblid=0
> >ad0: <WDC AC2540H/12.08R30> ATA-? disk at ata0 as master
> >ad0: 515MB (1056384 sectors), 1048 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> >ad0: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, PIO
> >Creating DISK ad0
> >Creating DISK wd0
> >ad1: piomode=3 dmamode=1 udmamode=-1 cblid=0
> >ad1: <WDC AC31200F/15.05F29> ATA-? disk at ata0 as slave 
> >ad1: 1222MB (2503872 sectors), 2484 cyls, 16 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S
> >ad1: 16 secs/int, 1 depth queue, PIO
> >Creating DISK ad1
> >Creating DISK wd1
> >Mounting root from ufs:wd0s1a
> >wd0s1: type 0xa5, start 63, end = 1056383, size 1056321 : OK
> >microuptime() went backwards (1.4342530 -> 1,047990)
> >start_init: trying /sbin/init
> >ad1s1: type 0xa5, start 63, end = 2503871, size 2503809 : OK 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> 

-- 
/=======================================================================\
| Work: Matthew.Thyer@dsto.defence.gov.au | Home: thyerm@camtech.net.au |
\=======================================================================/
"If it is true that our Universe has a zero net value for all conserved
quantities, then it may simply be a fluctuation of the vacuum of some
larger space in which our Universe is imbedded. In answer to the
question of why it happened, I offer the modest proposal that our
Universe is simply one of those things which happen from time to time."
 E. P. Tryon   from "Nature" Vol.246 Dec.14, 1973



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912120046500.2069-100000>