Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:55:28 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Jon Dama <jd@ugcs.caltech.edu> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFS for FreeBSD, new snapshot available Message-ID: <20050821175528.GB36164@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0508200043110.30207@vomit.ugcs.caltech.edu> References: <20050819015327.GA7627@crodrigues.org> <86fyt6gyds.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050819120309.GA10568@crodrigues.org> <86vf22dswg.fsf@xps.des.no> <4305D7FA.2070900@portaone.com> <20050819143741.GA11399@crodrigues.org> <Pine.LNX.4.53.0508200043110.30207@vomit.ugcs.caltech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:51:55AM -0700, Jon Dama wrote: > I'd just like to say, >=20 > I'm really glad to see this work going on. >=20 > On another note though (and I don't claim this applies in this case), the > gradual adoption of the practice by various developers to squirl away > changes to FreeBSD in their private repositories is responsible for a > substantial loss in quality in the subsequent releases. What evidence can you point to to support this assertion? Kris --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDCMAQWry0BWjoQKURAoYoAKCbby/ijkGYWRMlxeFvMpQBypgp5ACg5P4h bLWOKtVnsm4O7ZRYHx+S0cI= =l7qg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050821175528.GB36164>