Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 00:18:07 -0600 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for fast graphical web browser Message-ID: <20090807061807.GB4290@kokopelli.hydra> In-Reply-To: <200908031153.22226.w.riegler@cbtl.de> References: <b6c05a470907302332v1854cf30n75de2f98e879864d@mail.gmail.com> <200908031153.22226.w.riegler@cbtl.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 11:53:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote: > Has anyone tested Arora? I wouldn't recommend Arora as a "lightweight" browser to anyone who isn't already using applications built with the Qt toolkit. If you're a KDE user, it may be a good choice; if you aren't, it spectacularly fails at least one category of "lightweight" qualification, generally speaking. For that reason, I have not given Arora a try myself: I have found nothing compelling enough about any Qt applications to justify installing them and, along with them, the Qt GUI toolkit libraries (and any other KDE libraries the app in question might pull in). Your mileage, of course, may vary. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] Quoth Thomas McCauley: "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkp7xx8ACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKVaJwCghkBvF5ltKcouJcYip5ED0dKl htAAoOaV3giyiPZJzUzExcrEcHLFTqpS =LPMS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090807061807.GB4290>