Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:22:56 +0300 (EEST) From: locust <locust@sstc.kiev.ua> To: Alex <freebsd-reply@akruijff.dds.nl> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Berkeley packet filter question Message-ID: <20020403165741.N2095-100000@sstc.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <515243789.20020403000434@dds.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Alex wrote: l> Maybe it's a stupid question, but 'man bpf' don't let me know l> nothing with my problem. A> Isn't the berkeley packet filter called ipf? I mean that i have a problem with opening ports of FBSD with 'pseudo device bpf' in kernel, via gateway Cisco router. I posting my pervious message again(fixed version): Please forgive me for mistakes in English ------------------------------------------------------------------- I have installed frame-relay connection via Cisco 1700 router in front of my FreeBSD 4.4 machine. Put NAT, access list on Cisco. But when i opened by Cisco's NAT the FreeBSD's services such as apache server : ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.1 80 a.b.c.d 80 extendable where 192.168.1.1 - FreeBSD inside local area a.b.c.d - outside adress of Cisco then port 80 become 'filtered' from outside on a.b.c.d.. When i take away 'pseudo-device bpf ' from kernel of FBSD (recompile it), port 80 become 'open'. So, what i must to do with bpf(maybe configure smth) for opening of my services without deleting bpf from kernel? Without bpf it is no any trafshow, etc. :( I am not a guru FreeBSD,i'm studying :) I tried this situation with other systems (W2K, Linux) - there was no problems. Apache on W2K and Linux was opened for outside, and was successfuly browsed... Please forgive my english. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020403165741.N2095-100000>