Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:27:26 +1100 (EST)
From:      Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au>
To:        Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
Cc:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, Volker Stolz <stolz@hyperion.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>, Ian <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: idprio
Message-ID:  <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
In-Reply-To: <3CA0D3FE.8113515C@mindspring.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:

> > Sure it can, if the idprio process has locked a vnode trying to update

But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a
process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor?

Andrew


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020327092520.V24232-100000>