Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:16:22 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: GCC withdraw (was: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc) Message-ID: <20130823151622.GA46958@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <5217413A.9080105@passap.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 03:02:18PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > 23.08.2013 13:16, David Chisnall ??????????: > >> I have a patch that I intend to commit before the 10.0 code >> slush that removes GCC and libstdc++ from the default build >> on platforms where clang is the system compiler. We definitely >> don't want to be supporting our 6-year-old versions of these >> for the lifetime of the 10.x branch. > > Isn't it a POLA violation? > > As for me I expect something like this: > . 9.x gcc default and clang in base; > . 10.x clang default and gcc in base; > . 11.x gcc withdraw. > +1 -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130823151622.GA46958>