Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 00:58:51 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org> Cc: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 7000 ports! Message-ID: <20020526215851.GA22659@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <20020526.102257.128613796.imp@village.org> References: <20020525135436.A59827@xor.obsecurity.org> <3CF07E81.6040508@ezri.org> <20020526090500.A32725@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20020526.102257.128613796.imp@village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2002-05-26 10:22, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20020526090500.A32725@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes: > : So, your 96% is somewhat optimistic for very current > : FreeBSD-current. > > -current is massively F*'d right now wrt to perl, C++ and other common > things :-(. People are working on the problems. So judging ports > based on -current this month is likely to be massively unfair to > ports. Indeed. I was afraid to rebuild CURRENT and have my gcc upgraded to 3.x while having ports like textproc/docproj last night. I tested. Apart from known issues with perl and c++ all else seem to work. But judging ports from the state of CURRENT which is known to be unstable for certain periods is not fair, no not at all ;-) - Giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020526215851.GA22659>