Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Nov 2010 00:44:47 -0800
From:      perryh@pluto.rain.com
To:        bu7cher@yandex.ru
Cc:        freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: G_PART macro definitions
Message-ID:  <4cf367ff.58BO71PlaI7w0e4r%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CF35809.6050704@yandex.ru>
References:  <4cf21cd3.UbQ57eYkszW60Ww4%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4CF34297.4070300@yandex.ru> <4cf35138.VleaJCYj4z5kd9WX%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <4CF35809.6050704@yandex.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> wrote:

> > I would expect to find -- somewhere -- some definitions along the
> > lines of
> > 
> > #define G_PART_PROBE(table, cp) (*(table->XXX))(table, cp)
>
> They are generated from g_part_if.m by with awk script. Look at your
> build directory, there are g_part_if.[ch] files.

Aha!  That explains why I couldn't find them in the source distribution.

I don't yet have a build directory, because the system isn't up
and running yet -- I'm trying to figure out why my disk partitions
are not being recognized correctly.  There's a description of what
I currently think is happening at
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2010-November/224466.html



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4cf367ff.58BO71PlaI7w0e4r%perryh>