Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 23:34:54 +0200 From: Joerg Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/avr-libc Makefile Message-ID: <20030519233454.B21682@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <20030519212331.GA7480@rot13.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Mon, May 19, 2003 at 02:23:31PM -0700 References: <20030519104604.GB17366@sunbay.com> <20030519125334.D2937@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030519114332.GG17366@sunbay.com> <20030519115339.GI17366@sunbay.com> <20030519121239.GA6087@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030519122439.GA28176@sunbay.com> <20030519123128.GA6343@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030519144252.K2937@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030519144359.A9497@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20030519212331.GA7480@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Kris Kennaway wrote: > > And, why does this breakage only happen on 5.1, not on 5.0? > > The port *would* have been broken had someone set their own > i386-specific CFLAGS entry (which is what you suggested earlier in the > thread should be done instead of using bsd.cpu.mk and CPUTYPE) The > default setting of "-O -pipe" masked this software bug. I only suggested that those people who are really interested in getting the last possible 2 % speed enhancement might do that. By doing so, they silently agree that they value this speed enhancement more than the option of doing cross-compilation. My only gripe with all this is that it's broke^H^H^H^H^Henabled by default (and even with a particular stupid default...). -- cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030519233454.B21682>