Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 16:54:48 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/kern vfs_bio.c vfs_cluster.c vfs_subr.c src/sys/nfsclient nfs_bio.c src/sys/nfsserver nfs_serv.c src/sys/sys buf.h vnode.h Message-ID: <200207102054.g6AKsmgo046750@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <200207101702.g6AH2Xtl000528@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200207101702.g6AH2Xtl000528@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 10:02:32 -0700 (PDT), Matt Dillon <dillon@FreeBSD.org> said: > This commit along with another that Alan is working on for the VM page > global hash table will allow me to implement ranged fsync(), optimize > server-side nfs commit rpcs, and implement partial syncs by the > filesystem syncer (aka filesystem syncer would detect that someone is > trying to get the vnode lock, remembers its place, and skip to the > next vnode). How difficult is it likely to be to implement _POSIX_SYNCHRONIZED_IO consistency semantics? -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207102054.g6AKsmgo046750>