Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Sep 2011 19:05:49 +0200
From:      Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: sysutils/cfs
Message-ID:  <4E6A476D.7090800@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <20110909040954.17733a4e@cox.net>
References:  <4E651DCF.30605@FreeBSD.org>	<201109052146.p85Lkous037023@fire.js.berklix.net>	<CADLo838dMd5=TjRF5ffiaPH7o0%2BpeWgaqbQqEfDb3EP-n4ec8A@mail.gmail.com>	<4E67935C.6080702@aldan.algebra.com>	<CADLo838QkAjq2jPXy_c5MTYW09tZJMvWTNndo3Pnfa3=1c-5Og@mail.gmail.com>	<4E68AC85.4060705@icritical.com> <4E68F34C.6090504@FreeBSD.org> <20110909040954.17733a4e@cox.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 09.09.2011 11:09, schrieb Conrad J. Sabatier:
> On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:54:36 +0200
> Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> wrote:
> 
>> Am 08.09.2011 13:52, schrieb Matt Burke:
>>
>>> I want machines, tools, to do as *I* say not the other way round,
>>> whether it's good for me or not. If I wanted nannying and
>>> interference, I'd install Ubuntu.
>>
>> No, you'd use a managed installation.  Nobody stands there pointing a
>> gun at your head and forces you to uninstall a port that got removed
>> from the ports/ tree.  If people could recognize that, it might help
>> get the derailed discussion back on the right track.
> 
> You fail to take into account the case where a port may need to be
> reinstalled.  An extraordinary effort is required if the port no longer
> exists in the ports tree.

If a "port may need to be reinstalled" then you failed organize proper
backups.  Not a valid point here.

> Frankly, I'm growing increasingly concerned that this push to
> eliminate ports is getting out of control.  I don't much care for the
> notion that, having invested the time in installing, configuring and
> tuning a certain set of software packages, suddenly the rug could be
> pulled out from under me, so to speak, in essence *forcing* me to
> abandon using certain packages or else deal with maintaining them (in
> the ports maintainer sense) on my own.

The rug is pulled by the upstream maintainers abandoning their software,
not by FreeBSD no longer packaging it years after the fact.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E6A476D.7090800>