Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 13 Feb 1997 15:01:27 -0800
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
Cc:        pete@sms.fi, multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: broadcast video 
Message-ID:  <199702132301.PAA16006@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Feb 1997 15:52:57 MST." <199702132252.PAA16403@seagull.rtd.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

MPEG-2 is also intended for NTSC, HDTV, and computers

You can easily call up Optibase or C-Cube.

An mpeg decoder chip shall run you about $40 or less.

BTW: Is your box going to run FreeBSD?

	Amancio

>From The Desk Of Don Yuniskis :
> It seems that Amancio Hasty said:
> > >From The Desk Of Petri Helenius :
> > > Amancio Hasty writes:
> > >  > 
> > >  > H.261 or H.263 are great for real time encoding for TV quality
> > >  > you probably would want to use mpeg. So just read a little 
> > >  > on H.261, H.263, and mpeg. mpeg is almost tv quality depends
> > >  > on the kind of encoder options that you give to the mpeg
> > >  > encoder.
> > >  > 
> > >  > On todays, fast PCs we can do mpeg playback in software.
> > > 
> > > When you say MPEG above I take it that you were saying MPEG-1 since
> > > MPEG-2 can go beyond broadcast TV quality and is not that well
> > > decodable with software (the CPU power is not just there yet)
> > 
> > Yes, I meant MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 is supposed to HDTV or higher
> > quality than TV.
> 
> Yes, I understood that from the limited research I had already done.
> But, as I dig further into this, it seems like MPEG-*2* is intended
> for NTSC video.  From a FAQ (URL not available off hand, sorry...)
> 	"The emphasis for the DVD movie player [a DVD FAQ, obviously :>]
> 	is on high quality, 720x480 (NTSC), 60 field per second video
> 	encoded from 24 frame per second film..."
> But, *those* numbers don't "add-up", either. as "480" lines are not
> displayed at 60Hz (since the display is interlaced) and I think
> the active video is less than 720 wide...
> 
> Hmmm...
> 
> I guess I need to locate some video codec manufacturers and look at some
> data sheets to get a firmer understanding...
> 
> --don





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702132301.PAA16006>