Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:31:03 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>, Volker Stolz <stolz@hyperion.informatik.rwth-aachen.de>, Ian <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: idprio Message-ID: <20020326223103.GC93885@elvis.mu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> References: <3CA0D3FE.8113515C@mindspring.com> <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Andrew <andrew@ugh.net.au> [020326 14:27] wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Sure it can, if the idprio process has locked a vnode trying to update > > But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a > process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor? While sleeping for IO. -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020326223103.GC93885>