Date: Mon, 20 Oct 1997 12:45:46 -0400 From: Robin Cutshaw <robin@intercore.com> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com> Cc: Robin Cutshaw <robin@intercore.com>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fsck problem with 2.2.5-971015-BETA Message-ID: <19971020124546.62622@num1sun.intercore.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971019220410.24477A-100000@shell.futuresouth.com>; from Matthew D. Fuller on Sun, Oct 19, 1997 at 10:04:50PM -0500 References: <19971019212958.33788@num1sun.intercore.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971019220410.24477A-100000@shell.futuresouth.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 19, 1997 at 10:04:50PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >
> > Why does the fsck work correctly once the system is up in multi-user
> > mode?
> Because in multi-user, it has access to swap. If your turn swapon in
> single-user, I'll bet the fsck will work.
>
Swap is added just before the fsck (as is evidenced by the swapon
message appearing first and pstat -s showing it's there).
robin
--
----
Robin Cutshaw internet: robin@interlabs.com robin@intercore.com
Internet Labs, Inc. BellNet: 404-817-9787 robin@XFree86.Org
"Time is just one damn thing after another" -- PBS/Nova
----
--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19971020124546.62622>