Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 00:05:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: jeroen@vangelderen.org (Jeroen C. van Gelderen) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, jmb@hub.freebsd.org, ragnar@sysabend.org, brett@lariat.org, dscheidt@enteract.com, noslenj@swbell.net, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dual 400 -> dual 600 worth it? Message-ID: <199912160005.RAA25668@usr09.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <38571E5C.8D7CBA05@vangelderen.org> from "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" at Dec 15, 99 00:51:40 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > Now if only IKE/ISAKMP weren't based on clipper chip technology.. > > It's said to see someone like you issue such a FUDish statement. IKE > may have it's problems but this has nothing to do with it's 'Clipper > heritage'. ";login:" is read by a hell of a lot more people than my posts to "chat". The ";login:" article identifies many attacks against IKE/ISAKMP, and provides source code for one of them. > This reinforces my comments above. And if you quote the *relevant* > sections of the document it will become even clearer... The ";login:" document, or the IKE/ISAKMP document? > > It's interesting that OpenBSD has implemented IKE/ISAKMP already. > > What are you trying to say? That perhaps they would have something useful to say on the subject. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912160005.RAA25668>