Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 17 Mar 2013 16:48:28 -0600
From:      Chris Petrik <cpet@sdf.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Gnustep group
Message-ID:  <5146483C.50501@sdf.org>
In-Reply-To: <51464033.6010909@marino.st>
References:  <1363554409.51642@da3m0n8t3r.com> <51463C7C.8090405@sdf.org> <51464033.6010909@marino.st>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/17/2013 04:14 PM, John Marino wrote:
> On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote:
>>>
>>> Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working..
>>> it doesn't work with base clang.
>>>
>>> However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from
>>> svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build
>>> some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest.
>>> Here are my notes so far.
>>>
>
> FWIW - All the GNUstep ports build fine in DPorts (ports on 
> DragonFly).  However, the compiler uses is the base compiler, which is 
> GCC 4.7 with ObjC built-in.
>
> That would imply setting USE_GCC=4.6+ would "fix" gnustep on ports, no?
>
> John
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Base gcc in freebsd is 4.2 so yes that would needed.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5146483C.50501>