Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:03:42 +0900 From: "SANETO Takanori" <sanewo@ba2.so-net.ne.jp> To: <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: SMBFS problems in this morning's -CURRENT Message-ID: <002401c453fe$940412b0$1400a8c0@Venus> References: <200404191110.20057.jonathan@fosburgh.org><20040419181423.H650@korben> <4083FD45.6050604@FreeBSD.org><200404191136.53506.syjef@mdanderson.org> <20040419164656.GA56629@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Before calling mount(2), mount_smbfs calls smb_lib_init(), which requires smbfs module loaded. Solution 1: It's a spec. Put ``smbfs_load="YES"'' in your loader.conf. Solution 2: Modify(backout) mount_smbfs so that it behaves as before. Solution 3: Modify smb_lib_init so that it tries to load smbfs if it failed. Ideas? -- SANETO Takanori ----- Original Message ----- From: "leafy" <leafy@leafy.idv.tw> To: "Jonathan Fosburgh" <syjef@mdanderson.org> Cc: <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; "Lukas Ertl" <le@FreeBSD.org>; "Alex Dupre" <ale@FreeBSD.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 1:46 AM Subject: Re: SMBFS problems in this morning's -CURRENT > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:36:35AM -0500, Jonathan Fosburgh wrote: > > I had to do the same thing this time, but I assumed (perhaps incorrectly) that > > it had something to do with trying to use the previous, incorrect version of > > mount_smbfs. > > > > - -- > > Jonathan Fosburgh > The new binary requires this, the old one did not. The commit message > says that mount(2) will auto-load the smbfs kernel module, but I am > afraid it's not the case. > > Jiawei > -- > "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." > --inspired by The Tao of Programming
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?002401c453fe$940412b0$1400a8c0>