Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 May 2008 16:42:43 -0400
From:      Steve Bertrand <iaccounts@ibctech.ca>
To:        Paul Procacci <pprocacci@datapipe.com>
Cc:        Bob Johnson <fbsdlists@gmail.com>, DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Need to build a new mail server
Message-ID:  <484066C3.1000105@ibctech.ca>
In-Reply-To: <484061A9.6050201@datapipe.com>
References:  <483EE95F.8000509@studsvik.com>	<483FAD90.6010101@extracktor.com>	<484013A7.6020507@mikestammer.com>	<48401F97.9010003@pixelhammer.com>	<54db43990805301309q6345aa6dy78546deda8327293@mail.gmail.com> <484061A9.6050201@datapipe.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'd personally vouch for Qmail myself.  

So would I, for my environment.

> Having been an administrator now 
> for mail servers in general for nearly 15 years, with experience with 
> most notable mailers, Qmail by far lends itself to be the most highly 
> configurable mailer assuming you know what you want ahead of time.  

Agreed.

> Most 
> experienced sysadmins, once they know what they want, can apply those 
> patches to qmail with ease and roll out additional Qmail installations 
> with a single package.  Very easy indeed.

Yep.

> Bob, as for 'backscaatter spam' (assuming I understood you), that's 
> rubbish:
> http://www.interazioni.it/opensource/chkusr/ (as an example)

...which works very well.

Steve



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?484066C3.1000105>