Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 16:51:36 GMT From: Jake Guffey <jake.guffey@eprotex.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/179555: libspf2 conflicts incorrectly with p5-Mail-SPF Message-ID: <201306141651.r5EGpaQA037263@oldred.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201306141700.r5EH00FG030656@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 179555
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: libspf2 conflicts incorrectly with p5-Mail-SPF
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Fri Jun 14 17:00:00 UTC 2013
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Jake Guffey
>Release: 9.0-RELEASE
>Organization:
eProtex
>Environment:
>Description:
PR ports/157107 had a two part problem. mail/libspf2 and mail/p5-Mail-SPF listed each other as conflicts, due to an identically-named file used in both packages. p5-Mail-SPF has been fixed, but the libspf2 Makefile was never updated to fix this issue.
Until libspf2 is fixed, the original (closed) pr is only 1/2 solved.
>How-To-Repeat:
Pull the latest ports repository,
cd /usr/ports/mail/p5-Mail-SPF && make install
cd /usr/ports/mail/libspf2 && make install <---fail
>Fix:
This patch be sufficient, since p5-Mail-SPF includes an option to avoid the conflict outright.
Patch attached with submission follows:
diff -ur libspf2/Makefile libspf2.new/Makefile
--- libspf2/Makefile 2013-06-13 18:54:38.000000000 +0000
+++ libspf2.new/Makefile 2013-06-14 16:49:23.631924268 +0000
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
LICENSE= BSD LGPL21 LGPL3
LICENSE_COMB= dual
-CONFLICTS= ${PORTNAME}-1.0.* p5-Mail-SPF-[0-9]* p5-Mail-SPF-Query-[0-9]*
+CONFLICTS= ${PORTNAME}-1.0.* p5-Mail-SPF-Query-[0-9]*
GNU_CONFIGURE= yes
USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201306141651.r5EGpaQA037263>