Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 19:25:33 +0300 (EET DST) From: "Andrew V. Stesin" <stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua> To: scrappy@ki.net (Marc G. Fournier) Cc: stesin@elvisti.kiev.ua, Soenke.Behrens@conner.com, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Conner Drive Probs (Was: Re: Stable as bad with Adaptec as NCR) Message-ID: <199604011625.TAA14316@office.elvisti.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.92.960401102112.281C-100000@ki.net> from "Marc G. Fournier" at Apr 1, 96 10:25:24 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:) I don't think the 243F is okay, or else it is my other Conner drive :) that is giving problems: :) :) (ncr0:3:0): "CONNER CFA540S 13B0" type 0 fixed SCSI 2 :) sd3(ncr0:3:0): Direct-Access :) sd3(ncr0:3:0): FAST SCSI-2 100ns (10 Mb/sec) offset 8. :) 515MB (1056708 512 byte sectors) Pretty possible. I hadn't even a single problem with revision exactly 243F, but of course, YMMV. Good luck! Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604011625.TAA14316>