Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 09:12:03 -0500 From: Andrew Gould <andrewlylegould@gmail.com> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDE3 --> KDE4 Message-ID: <d356c5630908070712h60984206w7fb0bf992652fbdc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090807142320.0dcae186@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <D9D069F574EE82AE9F203CAB@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20090807003338.GC83349@thought.org> <20090807142320.0dcae186@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:23 AM, RW<rwmaillists@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:33:38 -0700 > Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> wrote: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0i'd be interested in Paul's question. =A0it may be that kd= e3 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 is sopping up waaaay to much disc space. =A0only have 6.5g >> =A0 =A0 =A0 left.... > > KDE4 makes =A0KDE3 look like Fluxbox. > > I can't remember =A0the exact figures on /usr, but I maintain my ccache > by timestamp, and it rose from 3.2GB to 7.9GB after adding KDE4. And > that 3.2GB figure included kde3 (including KOffice), xfce, fluxbox, > windowmaker, icewm and numerous gui and server applications. > > Is there an increase in usability/benefit to match the increase in resource consumption? (Please forgive me - I know that's a horribly subjective question.) Thanks, Andrew
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d356c5630908070712h60984206w7fb0bf992652fbdc>