Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:24:44 -0800 From: "Brian" <bri@sonicboom.org> To: "Petr Slansky" <slansky@usa.net>, <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.7 cannot fit to 200MB disk!! Message-ID: <021401c2bd1f$97371300$1a24200a@me3> References: <023HamqCC9392S16.1042475308@uwdvg016.cms.usa.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I wouldve bet the minimal install would fit in 200 megs..
Bri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Petr Slansky" <slansky@usa.net>
To: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 8:28 AM
Subject: FreeBSD 4.7 cannot fit to 200MB disk!!
> Hello!
>
> I tried to install FreBSD 4.7 on i486@133 with 16MB of Ram and 200MB disk.
W95
> worked nice on that machine. I failed to install a minimal configuration
of
> FreeBSD on such hardware!! Is it ok? I wanted only basic console...
>
> I noticed that many source files (*.h) were instaled to my disk. Is it
ok??
> >From my point of view, instalation could be more scalable, minimal could
be
> more minimal.
>
> This is not a big problem for me, I will run W95 on my old pc as I did. I
was
> only suprised how big modern FreeBSD is. Is it necessary? I like new
programs,
> more options, but I would like to have an option to add them only when I
need
> them.
>
> Thanks for FreeBSD!
> Petr
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Petr Slansky, slansky@usa.net
> ---------------------------------
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?021401c2bd1f$97371300$1a24200a>