Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 29 Jul 2000 13:13:19 -0700
From:      "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To:        Ben Williams <williamsl@home.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: ipnat and traceroute
Message-ID:  <20000729131319.A7953@cjc-desktop.reflexcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <174165251800.20000728204659@home.com>; from williamsl@home.com on Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:46:59PM -0400
References:  <174165251800.20000728204659@home.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[This mail was resent due to delivery problems. If you have received it twice, please ignore.]

On Fri, Jul 28, 2000 at 08:46:59PM -0400, Ben Williams wrote:
> Hi all. I have a 3.2-RELEASE system running as my "gateway" or
> "router" from my internal LAN connected to my cablemodem and I haven't
> been able to get traceroute's from inside the LAN to work. They work
> just fine from the gateway and I can ping and surf the net and do
> pretty much everything but traceroute from inside the LAN. My LAN is
> on non-routable address space. Can I make traceroutes work from
> inside with ipnat?

traceroute typically uses UDP querries and ICMP "time exceeded"
responses to do its thang. I would expect that ipnat(8) can properly
translate ICMP relpies. My first instinct would instead be to wonder
if you are not blocking either the UDP or ICMP at a firewall.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000729131319.A7953>