Date: Mon, 1 Apr 1996 11:22:00 -0500 (EST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: Advice/Recommendation needed Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.92.960401111626.281K-100000@ki.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi... I've been running -stable on my main machine for the past little while, but due to what I believe to be a hard drive problem, I'm replacing the root drive. What I'm wondering is, what is the reliability level of -SNAP currently? Should I stick with -stable on that machine? Or is -SNAP more stable then -stable? Main thing to consider is that I have a partner that is against FreeBSD (cause its free) and would like to get our main server as rock-solid as possible so that she can't use instability as an argument against me :( Marc G. Fournier | POP Mail Telnet Acct DNS Hosting System | WWW Services Database Services | Knowledge, Administrator | | Information and scrappy@ki.net | WWW: http://www.ki.net | Communications, Inc
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.92.960401111626.281K-100000>