Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:17:30 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: toolchain@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org, "re@FreeBSD.org Engineering Team" <re@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: patch to add AES intrinsics to gcc Message-ID: <5217A73A.7090402@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <521754E6.3030906@FreeBSD.org> References: <20130822200902.GG94127@funkthat.com> <105E26EE-8471-49D3-AB57-FBE2779CF8D0@FreeBSD.org> <CAE-m3X324rbdP_C=az4eO-EkMcR-yFAeRG7S4q%2BMUsnMezGddw@mail.gmail.com> <5CE4B5FA-9DA0-45E4-8D67-161E0829FE6B@FreeBSD.org> <52173C8D.20608@freebsd.org> <D879DDDA-EF9D-470A-A82E-04E83DB2A7E4__13641.8188493282$1377255996$gmane$org@FreeBSD.org> <521754E6.3030906@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8/23/13 8:26 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 23/08/2013 14:06 David Chisnall said the following: >> Our gcc is from 2007. It has no C11, no C++11 support. It has bugs in its >> atomic generation so you can't use it sensibly without lots of inline >> assembly (which it doesn't support for newer architectures) for >> multithreaded things. >> >> Our libstdc++ is ancient and doesn't work with modern C++ codebases. > On the other hand these tools are perfect for building FreeBSD kernel and base. > Extrapolating my experience with base GCC I am very confident in it as a > FreeBSD development tool. > Extrapolating my experience with Clang I am not yet confident in it as a > FreeBSD development tool. > > I do not care about C11, C++11 and modern C++ codebases. I care about what's > in /usr/src and what gets compiled by buildkernel/buildworld. That's just me, > of course. But, OTOH, those who care modern C++ codebases should be perfectly > capable to install a compiler from ports or switch to clang as their default > compiler. > +1 I'd like to see it still be "there if you need it" in 10 in 11 it's in ports
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5217A73A.7090402>