Date: Wed, 2 Oct 1996 10:25:43 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock <michaelh@cet.co.jp> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM, sos@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WARNING: botched ld.so commit! :-( Message-ID: <Pine.SV4.3.93.961002102251.1788A-100000@parkplace.cet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <199610011435.AAA32208@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Oct 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > This shows that the chflags on ld.so is mainly to [prevent] shoot[ing] > yourself in the foot. It doesn't improve security. > I was thinking of asking why we're evening using it when INITIAL_IMMUTABLE_LEVEL is not configurable without hardcoding the source. Regards, Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SV4.3.93.961002102251.1788A-100000>