Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:07:10 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>, "Suietov, Fiodor F" <fiodor.f.suietov@intel.com>, Stephen Hurd <shurd@sasktel.net>, Alexey Starikovskiy <alexey.y.starikovskiy@linux.intel.com>, "Podrezov, Valery A" <valery.a.podrezov@intel.com> Subject: Re: HP LH3000r hangs on boot with ACPI enabled Message-ID: <200702221507.15020.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200702221434.59679.jkim@FreeBSD.org> References: <B28E9812BAF6E2498B7EC5C427F293A401F472BA@orsmsx415.amr.corp.intel.com> <200702221434.59679.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 22 February 2007 02:34 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Thursday 22 February 2007 01:33 pm, Moore, Robert wrote: > > Good. As always, we are available for assistance as needed. > > Here are upstream patches against 20070126: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica/upstream-20070126.diff I just realized that I mismerged tbxface.c patch. A new patch is uploaded. Sorry, Jung-uk Kim > Thanks! > > Jung-uk Kim > > > Thanks, > > Bob > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Nate Lawson [mailto:nate@root.org] > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 5:00 PM > > > To: John Baldwin > > > Cc: Moore, Robert; Stephen Hurd; freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org; > > > Alexey Starikovskiy; Brown, Len; Suietov, Fiodor F; Podrezov, > > > Valery A Subject: Re: HP LH3000r hangs on boot with ACPI > > > enabled > > > > > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 21 February 2007 16:47, Moore, Robert wrote: > > > >> Nate, > > > >> > > > >> We have tried to keep ACPICA as OS-independent as possible. > > > >> In the > > > > case > > > > > >> of spinlocks, you can easily implement the interfaces with > > > >> whatever > > > > is > > > > > >> appropriate (or available) for your OS. > > > >> > > > >> We felt that we needed to split the mutex interfaces into > > > >> mutex/spinlocks for those hosts that have these different > > > >> types of synchronization mechanisms. > > > >> > > > >> Certainly, I would suggest that you keep up-to-date with the > > > >> latest ACPICA as we continue to develop and debug the code. > > > > > > > > Since the ACPI interrupt is run in an ithread, you can > > > > probably just ignore the IRQL stuff as garbage and use a > > > > regular mutex Nate. > > > > Also, > > > > > > this bug report was from 6.2, so it was actually from an > > > > older > > > > version > > > > > > of ACPICA. Can't recall what is holding up the MFC of > > > > 20051021 to > > > > 6.x. > > > > > Yes, I'm hoping we can do that. Jung-uk Kim is preparing a > > > patch of 20070126 so hopefully we can test and integrate that. > > > > > > We didn't MFC 20051021 due to a memory leak on some systems > > > (bad refcount). That was fixed a few revisions later, but I > > > remember a few 2006 versions having other problems (hanging on > > > boot) and then I ran > > > > out > > > > > of time to review/debug the patches. > > > > > > Hopefully 20070126 is good and we can commit it quickly, then > > > MFC > > > > after > > > > > a month. > > > > > > -- > > > Nate > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702221507.15020.jkim>