Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 22:22:00 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removing 'changes' section from the online edition Message-ID: <51AA57E8.2030105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306011250320.1365@wonkity.com> References: <CAF6rxgmionFt8Z7mrN0_JciThfyL4AMXcChRHWX1m%2BDE51FYLQ@mail.gmail.com> <51AA31C7.4010202@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1306011250320.1365@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Em 01-06-2013 20:52, Warren Block escreveu: >> No objection from me, I just want to bring it up again that handling >> these with a single-source solution would be nice, i.e. using DocBook >> profiling. It would also facilitate merges. This basically consists >> of adding edition="print" to the affected section of preface and then >> setting up profiling. (I can do it, just ping me if there is >> consensus on this). > > Yes! I was just talking about this elsewhere. Could we do it so only > the non-print sections need to be modified? You only need to add edition="online" to non-print sections. And only need to add edition="print" to non-online sections. The rest is shared and the markup is kept minimal. Gabor
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51AA57E8.2030105>