Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 11:27:30 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net>, "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=6.1 wrong in linux_base-62 ??? Message-ID: <20011117112730.A8398@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20011117075058.GA21776@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <20011115211037.B721@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200111161203.fAGC3FI05149@gits.dyndns.org> <20011116184522.A528@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> <20011117075058.GA21776@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 17, 2001 at 08:50:58AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > Well, could we then agree upon, to change staroffice60 port > dependencies to linux_base or linux_base or linux_base-62 ? It has a dependency on one of the linux_base ports. The intend is to move everything over to linux_base-7, AFAICT. The one thing that we need to avoid is that if a port does work with both 6 and 7 and 6 is installed, the port does not try to install 7 on top of 6 if we make it dependent on 7. It's probably a good idea to block the ability to install 7 on top of 6 by default and create a knob that puts the user in the driver's seat with a loaded gun pointing at his feet... > BTW, could we upgrade the port linux_base to match linux_base-62 > and get rid of linux_base-62 ??? Yes. It's up to David to fill us in about his intentions. There's no point to continue to be in each other's way. If David has a good idea and is implementing it then I don't want to step on his toes, irrespective of whether or not he stepped on my toes. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011117112730.A8398>