Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Oct 2002 22:16:23 +0200
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Daniel Holmes <danielh@zorkmid.dakcs.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: [ GEOM tests ] vinum drives lost 
Message-ID:  <75554.1033762583@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2002 14:11:12 MDT." <200210042011.g94KBCcq036473@zorkmid.dakcs.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200210042011.g94KBCcq036473@zorkmid.dakcs.com>, Daniel Holmes write
s:

>As I understand vinum & ccd (please correct me if I am wrong), this will
>keep ccd from ever achieving the performance and ease of use of vinum.

I don't think anybody advocated ccd as a wholesale replacement for
vinum.  That being said, I have lost more data on vinum RAID5
volumes than on striped ccd parititions, and not becaue of hardware
failures.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75554.1033762583>