Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 10:22:08 -0600 From: Peter Schultz <pmes@bis.midco.net> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] for SCHED_ULE & libpthread issue (was Re: I like SCHED_4BSD) Message-ID: <4059CCB0.1050901@bis.midco.net> In-Reply-To: <20040318023045.GE3018@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <XFMail.20040310213645.conrads@cox.net> <4050BBCB.50302@cinci.rr.com> <20040312092348.18be60e0.taku@cent.saitama-u.ac.jp> <20040318023045.GE3018@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:23:47AM +0900, Taku YAMAMOTO wrote: > >>Until the problem is fully addressed, I will propose following patch >>to be applied. (the least intrusive one attached in the former message) > > > Do people think we should commit this? > I don't recall seeing any reports from people running UP, but it seems to do the trick for us SMP folks. Has anyone heard from Jeff lately? I suppose he's got something major in the works, but this patch seems fairly benign. Jeff is a nice guy, I don't think he will lash out at anyone for trying to help out. Although, the way people have been acting the last week or so, I'm not certain. ;) Pete...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4059CCB0.1050901>