Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 13:31:17 -0700 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: "George V. Neville-Neil" <gnn@FreeBSD.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r297225 - in head/sys: net netinet netinet6 Message-ID: <20160324203117.GY2616@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201603240754.u2O7suvM006925@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201603240754.u2O7suvM006925@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 07:54:56AM +0000, George V. Neville-Neil wrote: G> Author: gnn G> Date: Thu Mar 24 07:54:56 2016 G> New Revision: 297225 G> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/297225 G> G> Log: G> FreeBSD previously provided route caching for TCP (and UDP). Re-add G> route caching for TCP, with some improvements. In particular, invalidate G> the route cache if a new route is added, which might be a better match. G> The cache is automatically invalidated if the old route is deleted. G> G> Submitted by: Mike Karels G> Reviewed by: gnn G> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D4306 I'm quite surprised to see this checked in, taking into account that the D4306 has strong disagreement from melifaro@. So, now we got two aids for poor routing: TCP route caching & flowtable. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160324203117.GY2616>