Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:26:22 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Cc: i386@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 Message-ID: <10419.1058768782@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Jul 2003 08:21:31 %2B0200." <xzpwuec8kno.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <xzpwuec8kno.fsf@dwp.des.no>, Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= writes: >Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes: >> Tinderbox wrote: >> > gzip -cn /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/src/lib/libc/nls/catgets.3 > catgets.3.gz >> > Segmentation fault (core dumped) >> > *** Error code 139 >> These false alarms are wearing a bit thin. Is there a problem with the >> tinderbox build machine perhaps? > >No, the failures are too systematic for that. Don't trust that, I've seen RAM errors be reproducible to +/- 4 instructions in the cc1 binary in the past. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10419.1058768782>