Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:36:01 -0800 From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> To: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs inode.h src/sys/sys conf.h src/sys/ufs/ffs ffs_snapshot.c Message-ID: <200212152036.gBFKa159013772@beastie.mckusick.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:42:22 MST." <3DFCDB1E.3000605@btc.adaptec.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:42:22 -0700 From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com> CC: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, re@freebsd.org, Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs inode.h src/sys/sys conf.h ... X-ASK-Info: Confirmed by User Kirk, Thanks a lot for doing this. Just FYI, re@ approval is not needed for this kind of thing in HEAD. Assuming that there are no other issues with this, do you feel it's ready for RELENG_5_0 yet? Scott I definitely want this change to get into RELENG_5_0. The delay of the previous change was primarily to make sure that it did not break anything (it did, 64-bit support), so the initial delay in pushing it was clearly warrented. Once we are confident that no other problems arise, both the previous and current change to snapshots should be pushed to RELENG_5_0. Snapshots as they stand in RELENG_5_0 are broken. Kirk McKusick =-=-=-=-=-= Kirk McKusick wrote: > Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:04:20 -0500 > From: Jake Burkholder > To: Kirk McKusick > Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/ufs/ufs inode.h src/sys/sys conf.h ... > > Apparently, On Sat, Dec 14, 2002 at 12:29:46PM -0800, > Kirk McKusick said words to the effect of; > > > As a followup to my previous message, here is my proposed (and > > even tested!) change to use an appropriately wide field. > > > > So is this going to be committed? I'm tired of the tinderbox > failing and would like to update my sparcs. I'm glad I had > an older perforce tree so I was able to get some work done > this weekend. > > Jake > > I was unsure as to whether I had to get release engineerings approval > to make the change. As I had approval for the previous change and as > Ian Dowse has signed off on it, I have just now committed the change. > Sorry for the delay. > > Kirk McKusick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200212152036.gBFKa159013772>