Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Oct 2014 08:58:59 +0200
From:      Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: latest freebsd:11:x86:64 repo and ruby 1.9 -> 2.0
Message-ID:  <20141020065859.GI37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
In-Reply-To: <5444ABC3.2040904@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <544232F7.3060909@FreeBSD.org> <20141019220854.GH37244@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <5444ABC3.2040904@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--OfrWf2Fun5Ae4m0Y
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 09:29:23AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> On 20/10/2014 01:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 12:29:27PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>> $ pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD
> >>> repository is up-to-date. Updating poudriere repository catalogue...=
=20
> >>> poudriere repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date.=
=20
> >>> Checking for upgrades (24 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done
> >>> (1 conflicting) Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The
> >>> following 24 packages will be affected (of 0 checked):
> >>=20
> >> First, a minor nit: of 0 checked?
> >>=20
> >>> Installed packages to be REMOVED: ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1 porttools-1.02=
=20
> >>> newfile-1.0.14_4 hub-1.12.2 libchk-1.10.3 zfs-snapshot-mgmt-20090201_2
> >>=20
> >> Then the real problem, I do not want these packages to be removed exce=
pt
> >> for ruby-1.9.3.547_3,1.  In other words, I want to keep using
> >> zfs-snapshot-mgmt, libchk, hub and porttools.  What should I do?
> >=20
> > Just accept the upgrade and reinstall them they are there. we need to
> > improve the solver to prevent that.
>=20
> OK.  This should work for me this time, but in general we can see how ann=
oying
> this could be if dozens of packages would be affected.

Yes the problem is we have no way yet to know ruby-2.0 is an upgrade of rub=
y-1.9

pkg 1.4 will know that.
So it will be fixed automagically by pkg 1.4

regards,
Bapt

--OfrWf2Fun5Ae4m0Y
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlREsrMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwpIACfQb1SCqD5CDiQ0tSXBmbh5E1W
JNIAn3c04WIK1WACoTbdGhfEX6dfi+2B
=paRT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--OfrWf2Fun5Ae4m0Y--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20141020065859.GI37244>