Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:41:48 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD 9 Production Ready? Message-ID: <50B1694C.8010600@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <50B16353.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz> References: <50B0F80B.6090400@tundraware.com> <50B10185.2010500@bnrlabs.com> <50B105AE.4050008@tundraware.com> <50B16353.8030708@ShaneWare.Biz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/24/2012 06:16 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 25/11/2012 04:06, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> But I have had essentially no problems doing in-place major rev >> updates with FreeBSD thus far. The only breakage I am worried about >> now is whether the new compiler change breaks things that used to >> work just fine. For example, will my make.conf settings be properly >> observed by the new tool chain? > > > If you want to build with clang wait for 9.1 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=threads/165173 I plan to stay conservative and only switch to clang when it is THE way to build everything. i.e., When GCC is finally retired for use in the base OS. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk tundra@tundraware.com PGP Key: http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B1694C.8010600>